The Nigerian House of Representatives has introduced a bill proposing stringent penalties for examination malpractice, including up to five years imprisonment or a fine of ₦500,000 for individuals convicted of leaking exam questions. The bill, titled the “Examination Malpractices Act (Repeal and Enactment) Bill, 2025 (HB2097),” was introduced on March 6, 2025, by Hon. Esosa Iyawe, representing the Oredo Federal Constituency, and is currently awaiting its second reading.
Key Provisions of the Proposed Bill
- Leaking Exam Questions: Individuals found guilty of leaking examination questions may face a five-year jail term, a ₦500,000 fine, or both.
- Minors Involved in Malpractice: Persons under 18 years convicted of examination malpractice could receive a three-year jail term, with considerations under the Child Rights Act.
- Use of Technological Devices: Candidates using unauthorized technological devices during exams may be fined ₦500,000, imprisoned for up to three years, or both.
- Education Officials: Principals, teachers, invigilators, or any examination body staff involved in malpractice may face a mandatory four-year imprisonment without the option of a fine.
- Altering Exam Scores: Individuals who alter or tamper with examination scores without lawful excuse may be fined ₦400,000, imprisoned for four years, or both.
- Impersonation and Theft of Exam Materials: Candidates impersonating others or stealing exam materials may face a ₦500,000 fine, up to three years imprisonment, or both.
Public Reactions
The proposed legislation has elicited mixed reactions from the public. Some Nigerians support the bill, viewing it as a necessary step to uphold the integrity of the educational system. However, others criticize it as a misplacement of priorities, arguing that lawmakers should focus on more pressing national issues.
Critics also point out that existing laws already address examination malpractice, suggesting that the focus should be on enforcing current regulations rather than introducing new ones. Concerns have been raised about the potential for such stringent penalties to disproportionately affect students, especially minors, without addressing the root causes of malpractice.
Conclusion
As the bill progresses through legislative processes, it remains to be seen how lawmakers will balance the need for academic integrity with fair and effective enforcement measures. The debate underscores the complexities involved in reforming educational policies and the importance of considering diverse perspectives in the legislative process.
